Italy vs South Korea: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Italy
88.89
in 2014
South Korea
88.89
in 2014
Italy rank
3rd
South Korea rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Italy
- South Korea
How they compare
Italy currently reports 88.89 against 88.89 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 3rd and South Korea ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.89 | 75.56 | 13.33 | Italy |
| 2010s | 88.89 | 88.89 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Italy or South Korea?
- Italy, at 88.89 against 88.89 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Italy and South Korea?
- 0, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and South Korea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Italy and South Korea rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Italy ranks 3rd and South Korea ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.