Ireland vs Panama: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Ireland
100
in 2014
Panama
88.89
in 2014
Ireland rank
1st
Panama rank
3rd

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Ireland
  • Panama
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 100 against 88.89 in Panama, a difference of 11.11.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.

Ireland ranks 1st and Panama ranks 3rd of 181 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 100 88.89 11.11 Ireland
2010s 100 88.89 11.11 Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Ireland or Panama?
Ireland, at 100 against 88.89 in Panama as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Ireland and Panama?
11.11, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Panama?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Ireland and Panama rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Ireland ranks 1st and Panama ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.