Iraq vs Laos: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Iraq
11.11
in 2014
Laos
11.11
in 2014
Iraq rank
167th
Laos rank
167th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Iraq
  • Laos
02.557.510200520092014

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 11.11 against 11.11 in Laos, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 167th and Laos ranks 167th of 181 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Laos Difference Ahead
2000s 11.11 6.67 4.44 Iraq
2010s 11.11 11.11 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Iraq or Laos?
Iraq, at 11.11 against 11.11 in Laos as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Iraq and Laos?
0, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Laos?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Iraq and Laos rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Iraq ranks 167th and Laos ranks 167th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.