Iraq vs Kazakhstan: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Iraq
11.11
in 2014
Kazakhstan
11.11
in 2014
Iraq rank
167th
Kazakhstan rank
167th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Iraq
  • Kazakhstan
02.557.510200520092014

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 11.11 against 11.11 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 167th and Kazakhstan ranks 167th of 181 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 11.11 0 11.11 Iraq
2010s 11.11 11.11 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Iraq or Kazakhstan?
Iraq, at 11.11 against 11.11 in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Iraq and Kazakhstan?
0, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Kazakhstan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Iraq and Kazakhstan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Iraq ranks 167th and Kazakhstan ranks 167th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.