Hong Kong (China) vs Korea: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Hong Kong (China)
88.89
in 2014
Korea
88.89
in 2014
Hong Kong (China) rank
3rd
Korea rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Korea
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 88.89 against 88.89 in Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Korea ahead.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Hong Kong (China) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.22 | 75.56 | 6.67 | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2010s | 88.89 | 88.89 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Hong Kong (China) or Korea?
- Hong Kong (China), at 88.89 against 88.89 in Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Hong Kong (China) and Korea?
- 0, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Korea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Korea rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.