Hong Kong (China) vs Ireland: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Hong Kong (China)
88.89
in 2014
Ireland
100
in 2014
Hong Kong (China) rank
3rd
Ireland rank
1st
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 100 against 88.89 in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 11.11.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong (China)'s.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd and Ireland ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.22 | 100 | 17.78 | Ireland |
| 2010s | 88.89 | 100 | 11.11 | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Hong Kong (China) or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 100 against 88.89 in Hong Kong (China) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Hong Kong (China) and Ireland?
- 11.11, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Ireland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Ireland rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd and Ireland ranks 1st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.