Guyana vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Guyana
55.56
in 2014
Senegal
55.56
in 2014
Guyana rank
76th
Senegal rank
76th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Guyana
  • Senegal
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 55.56 against 55.56 in Senegal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 76th and Senegal ranks 76th of 181 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Senegal Difference Ahead
2000s 55.56 22.22 33.33 Guyana
2010s 55.56 55.56 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Guyana or Senegal?
Guyana, at 55.56 against 55.56 in Senegal as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Guyana and Senegal?
0, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Senegal?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guyana and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Guyana ranks 76th and Senegal ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.