Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Guatemala
33.33
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
33.33
in 2014
Guatemala rank
137th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
137th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Guatemala
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 137th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 183 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.56 | 33.33 | 2.22 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Guatemala or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Guatemala, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Guatemala ranks 137th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.