Guatemala vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Guatemala
33.33
in 2014
Namibia
33.33
in 2014
Guatemala rank
136th
Namibia rank
136th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Guatemala
- Namibia
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.56 | 33.33 | 2.22 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Guatemala or Namibia?
- Guatemala, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Namibia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Guatemala and Namibia?
- 0, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Guatemala ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 136th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.