Grenada vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Grenada
77.78
in 2014
Mauritius
77.78
in 2014
Grenada rank
16th
Mauritius rank
16th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Grenada
  • Mauritius
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 77.78 against 77.78 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 77.78 77.78 0
2010s 77.78 77.78 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Grenada or Mauritius?
Grenada, at 77.78 against 77.78 in Mauritius as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Grenada and Mauritius?
0, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritius?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Grenada and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Grenada ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.