Gabon vs Vanuatu: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Gabon
55.56
in 2014
Vanuatu
55.56
in 2014
Gabon rank
76th
Vanuatu rank
76th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Gabon
  • Vanuatu
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 55.56 against 55.56 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gabon ahead.

Gabon ranks 76th and Vanuatu ranks 76th of 181 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 62.22 55.56 6.67 Gabon
2010s 55.56 55.56 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Gabon or Vanuatu?
Gabon, at 55.56 against 55.56 in Vanuatu as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Gabon and Vanuatu?
0, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Vanuatu?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Gabon and Vanuatu rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Gabon ranks 76th and Vanuatu ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.