France vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- France
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
France currently reports 100 against 88.89 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 11.11.
That makes France's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
France ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 80 | 0 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 100 | 88.89 | 11.11 | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, France or United Arab Emirates?
- France, at 100 against 88.89 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between France and United Arab Emirates?
- 11.11, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do France and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- France ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.