France vs Sweden: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

France
100
in 2014
Sweden
88.89
in 2014
France rank
1st
Sweden rank
3rd

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • France
  • Sweden
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

France currently reports 100 against 88.89 in Sweden, a difference of 11.11.

That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sweden ahead.

France ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 3rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 80 88.89 8.89 Sweden
2010s 100 88.89 11.11 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, France or Sweden?
France, at 100 against 88.89 in Sweden as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between France and Sweden?
11.11, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Sweden?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do France and Sweden rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
France ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.