France vs Kosovo: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

France
100
in 2014
Kosovo
33.33
in 2014
France rank
1st
Kosovo rank
1st

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • France
  • Kosovo
406080100200520092014

How they compare

France currently reports 100 against 33.33 in Kosovo, a difference of 66.67.

That makes France's figure about 3.0 times Kosovo's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

France ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Kosovo Difference Ahead
2000s 100 33.33 66.67 France
2010s 100 33.33 66.67 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, France or Kosovo?
France, at 100 against 33.33 in Kosovo as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between France and Kosovo?
66.67, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Kosovo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do France and Kosovo rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
France ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.