France vs South Korea: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
France
100
in 2014
South Korea
88.89
in 2014
France rank
1st
South Korea rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- France
- South Korea
How they compare
France currently reports 100 against 88.89 in South Korea, a difference of 11.11.
That makes France's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Korea ahead.
France ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 75.56 | 4.44 | France |
| 2010s | 100 | 88.89 | 11.11 | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, France or South Korea?
- France, at 100 against 88.89 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between France and South Korea?
- 11.11, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and South Korea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do France and South Korea rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- France ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.