Eswatini vs Tanzania: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Eswatini
44.44
in 2014
Tanzania
44.44
in 2014
Eswatini rank
106th
Tanzania rank
106th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Eswatini
- Tanzania
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 106th and Tanzania ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 40 | 6.67 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 40 | 44.44 | 4.44 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Eswatini or Tanzania?
- Eswatini, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Tanzania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Eswatini and Tanzania?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tanzania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Tanzania rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Eswatini ranks 106th and Tanzania ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.