Eswatini vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Eswatini
44.44
in 2014
Mozambique
44.44
in 2014
Eswatini rank
106th
Mozambique rank
106th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Eswatini
- Mozambique
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 106th and Mozambique ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 44.44 | 11.11 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 40 | 44.44 | 4.44 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Eswatini or Mozambique?
- Eswatini, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Mozambique as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Mozambique rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Eswatini ranks 106th and Mozambique ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.