EST vs IRL: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
EST
88.89
in 2014
IRL
100
in 2014
EST rank
3rd
IRL rank
1st
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- EST
- IRL
How they compare
IRL currently reports 100 against 88.89 in EST, a difference of 11.11.
That makes IRL's figure about 1.1 times EST's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, IRL has been ahead every year.
EST ranks 3rd and IRL ranks 1st of 181 countries.
IRL has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | EST | IRL | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.89 | 100 | 11.11 | IRL |
| 2010s | 88.89 | 100 | 11.11 | IRL |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, EST or IRL?
- IRL, at 100 against 88.89 in EST as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between EST and IRL?
- 11.11, with IRL ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for EST and IRL?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do EST and IRL rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- EST ranks 3rd and IRL ranks 1st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.