Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Equatorial Guinea
44.44
in 2014
Maldives
44.44
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
107th
Maldives rank
107th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Maldives
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Maldives, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 107th and Maldives ranks 107th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Equatorial Guinea or Maldives?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Maldives as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Maldives rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 107th and Maldives ranks 107th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.