Ecuador vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Ecuador
44.44
in 2014
Uganda
44.44
in 2014
Ecuador rank
106th
Uganda rank
106th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Ecuador
  • Uganda
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Uganda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 106th and Uganda ranks 106th of 181 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 37.78 26.67 11.11 Ecuador
2010s 44.44 44.44 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Ecuador or Uganda?
Ecuador, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Uganda as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Ecuador and Uganda?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Uganda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Ecuador and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Ecuador ranks 106th and Uganda ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.