Dominican Republic vs Georgia: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Dominican Republic
77.78
in 2014
Georgia
77.78
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
16th
Georgia rank
16th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Dominican Republic
- Georgia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 77.78 against 77.78 in Georgia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 16th and Georgia ranks 16th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.22 | 40 | 22.22 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 68.89 | 77.78 | 8.89 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Dominican Republic or Georgia?
- Dominican Republic, at 77.78 against 77.78 in Georgia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Dominican Republic and Georgia?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Georgia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Georgia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Dominican Republic ranks 16th and Georgia ranks 16th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.