Djibouti vs Panama: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Djibouti
66.67
in 2014
Panama
88.89
in 2014
Djibouti rank
1st
Panama rank
3rd

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Djibouti
  • Panama
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Panama currently reports 88.89 against 66.67 in Djibouti, a difference of 22.22.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.3 times Djibouti's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 1st and Panama ranks 3rd of 1 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 88.89 55.56 Panama
2010s 66.67 88.89 22.22 Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Djibouti or Panama?
Panama, at 88.89 against 66.67 in Djibouti as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Djibouti and Panama?
22.22, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Panama?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Djibouti and Panama rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Djibouti ranks 1st and Panama ranks 3rd of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.