Djibouti vs Japan: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Djibouti
66.67
in 2014
Japan
88.89
in 2014
Djibouti rank
1st
Japan rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Djibouti
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 88.89 against 66.67 in Djibouti, a difference of 22.22.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Djibouti's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 1st and Japan ranks 3rd of 1 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 88.89 | 55.56 | Japan |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 88.89 | 22.22 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Djibouti or Japan?
- Japan, at 88.89 against 66.67 in Djibouti as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Djibouti and Japan?
- 22.22, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Japan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Djibouti and Japan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Djibouti ranks 1st and Japan ranks 3rd of 1 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.