Denmark vs Dominican Republic: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Denmark
77.78
in 2014
Dominican Republic
77.78
in 2014
Denmark rank
16th
Dominican Republic rank
16th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 77.78 against 77.78 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 16th and Dominican Republic ranks 16th of 181 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.78 | 62.22 | 15.56 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 77.78 | 68.89 | 8.89 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Denmark or Dominican Republic?
- Denmark, at 77.78 against 77.78 in Dominican Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Denmark and Dominican Republic?
- 0, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Dominican Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Denmark and Dominican Republic rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Denmark ranks 16th and Dominican Republic ranks 16th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.