Croatia vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Croatia
55.56
in 2014
Uruguay
55.56
in 2014
Croatia rank
76th
Uruguay rank
76th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Croatia
  • Uruguay
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 55.56 against 55.56 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 76th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 55.56 55.56 0
2010s 55.56 55.56 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Croatia or Uruguay?
Croatia, at 55.56 against 55.56 in Uruguay as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Croatia and Uruguay?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Uruguay?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Croatia and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Croatia ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.