Congo vs Tajikistan: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Congo
0
in 2014
Tajikistan
0
in 2014
Congo rank
175th
Tajikistan rank
175th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Congo
  • Tajikistan
00.20.40.60.81200520092014

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 against 0 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 175th and Tajikistan ranks 175th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Congo or Tajikistan?
Congo, at 0 against 0 in Tajikistan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Congo and Tajikistan?
0, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tajikistan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Congo and Tajikistan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Congo ranks 175th and Tajikistan ranks 175th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.