Congo vs Malawi: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Congo
0
in 2014
Malawi
0
in 2014
Congo rank
175th
Malawi rank
175th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Congo
  • Malawi
02.557.510200520092014

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 against 0 in Malawi, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 175th and Malawi ranks 175th of 181 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 0 2.22 2.22 Malawi
2010s 0 4.44 4.44 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Congo or Malawi?
Congo, at 0 against 0 in Malawi as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Congo and Malawi?
0, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malawi?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Congo and Malawi rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Congo ranks 175th and Malawi ranks 175th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.