Democratic Republic of Congo vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Democratic Republic of Congo
44.44
in 2014
Maldives
44.44
in 2014
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
106th
Maldives rank
106th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Maldives
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Maldives, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th and Maldives ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Democratic Republic of Congo or Maldives?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Maldives as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Democratic Republic of Congo and Maldives?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Maldives?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Maldives rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th and Maldives ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.