Comoros vs Nigeria: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Comoros
22.22
in 2014
Nigeria
22.22
in 2014
Comoros rank
157th
Nigeria rank
157th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Comoros
  • Nigeria
05101520200520092014

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 22.22 against 22.22 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 157th and Nigeria ranks 157th of 181 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 22.22 20 2.22 Comoros
2010s 22.22 22.22 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Comoros or Nigeria?
Comoros, at 22.22 against 22.22 in Nigeria as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Comoros and Nigeria?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Nigeria?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Comoros and Nigeria rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Comoros ranks 157th and Nigeria ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.