Cameroon vs Congo: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Cameroon
0
in 2014
Congo
0
in 2014
Cameroon rank
175th
Congo rank
175th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Cameroon
  • Congo
05101520200520092014

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0 against 0 in Congo, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 175th and Congo ranks 175th of 181 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 20 0 20 Cameroon
2010s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Cameroon or Congo?
Cameroon, at 0 against 0 in Congo as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Cameroon and Congo?
0, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Congo?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cameroon and Congo rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Cameroon ranks 175th and Congo ranks 175th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.