Cambodia vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Cambodia
33.33
in 2014
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
33.33
in 2014
Cambodia rank
137th
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
137th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Cambodia
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 137th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 137th of 184 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.22 | 33.33 | 11.11 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Cambodia or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Cambodia, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Cambodia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Cambodia ranks 137th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 137th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.