Cambodia vs Chad: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Cambodia
33.33
in 2014
Chad
33.33
in 2014
Cambodia rank
136th
Chad rank
136th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Cambodia
  • Chad
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Chad, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 136th and Chad ranks 136th of 181 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Chad Difference Ahead
2000s 28.89 44.44 15.56 Chad
2010s 33.33 40 6.67 Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Cambodia or Chad?
Cambodia, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Chad as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Cambodia and Chad?
0, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Chad?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cambodia and Chad rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Cambodia ranks 136th and Chad ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.