Cabo Verde vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Cabo Verde
44.44
in 2014
Zambia
44.44
in 2014
Cabo Verde rank
106th
Zambia rank
106th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Zambia
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Cabo Verde currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Zambia, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 106th and Zambia ranks 106th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 44.44 44.44 0
2010s 44.44 44.44 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Cabo Verde or Zambia?
Cabo Verde, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Zambia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Cabo Verde and Zambia?
0, with Cabo Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Zambia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cabo Verde and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Cabo Verde ranks 106th and Zambia ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.