Cabo Verde vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Cabo Verde
44.44
in 2014
Iran, Islamic Rep.
44.44
in 2014
Cabo Verde rank
106th
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
106th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Cabo Verde
- Iran, Islamic Rep.
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Iran, Islamic Rep., a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Rep. has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 106th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Iran, Islamic Rep. | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Cabo Verde or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
- Cabo Verde, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Iran, Islamic Rep. as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Cabo Verde and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
- 0, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cabo Verde and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Cabo Verde ranks 106th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.