Cape Verde vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Cape Verde
44.44
in 2014
Eswatini
44.44
in 2014
Cape Verde rank
106th
Eswatini rank
106th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Cape Verde
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 106th and Eswatini ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.44 | 33.33 | 11.11 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 44.44 | 40 | 4.44 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Cape Verde or Eswatini?
- Cape Verde, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Eswatini as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cape Verde and Eswatini rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Cape Verde ranks 106th and Eswatini ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.