Bulgaria vs St. Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Bulgaria
77.78
in 2014
St. Kitts and Nevis
77.78
in 2014
Bulgaria rank
16th
St. Kitts and Nevis rank
16th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Bulgaria
- St. Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 77.78 against 77.78 in St. Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, St. Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Bulgaria ranks 16th and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 16th of 183 countries.
St. Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | St. Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.89 | 77.78 | 8.89 | St. Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 77.78 | 77.78 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Bulgaria or St. Kitts and Nevis?
- Bulgaria, at 77.78 against 77.78 in St. Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Bulgaria and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bulgaria and St. Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Bulgaria ranks 16th and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 16th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.