Brunei Darussalam vs Madagascar: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Brunei Darussalam
66.67
in 2014
Madagascar
66.67
in 2014
Brunei Darussalam rank
44th
Madagascar rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Madagascar
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 44th and Madagascar ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 55.56 | 11.11 | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Brunei Darussalam or Madagascar?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Madagascar as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Brunei Darussalam and Madagascar?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Madagascar?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Madagascar rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 44th and Madagascar ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.