Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
33.33
in 2014
Namibia
33.33
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
137th
Namibia rank
137th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Namibia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 137th of 183 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.22 | 33.33 | 8.89 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Namibia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Namibia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 137th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.