Bolivia vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Bolivia
44.44
in 2014
Democratic Republic of Congo
44.44
in 2014
Bolivia rank
106th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
106th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Bolivia
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of Congo has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 106th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 44.44 | 44.44 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Bolivia or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Bolivia, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Bolivia and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bolivia and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Bolivia ranks 106th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.