Bhutan vs Central African Republic: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Bhutan
22.22
in 2014
Central African Republic
22.22
in 2014
Bhutan rank
157th
Central African Republic rank
157th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Bhutan
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 22.22 against 22.22 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 157th and Central African Republic ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.22 | 31.11 | 8.89 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 22.22 | 22.22 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Bhutan or Central African Republic?
- Bhutan, at 22.22 against 22.22 in Central African Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Bhutan and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Central African Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bhutan and Central African Republic rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Bhutan ranks 157th and Central African Republic ranks 157th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.