Benin vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Benin
44.44
in 2014
Eswatini
44.44
in 2014
Benin rank
106th
Eswatini rank
106th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Benin
  • Eswatini
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Benin currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Benin ranks 106th and Eswatini ranks 106th of 181 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 33.33 0
2010s 37.78 40 2.22 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Benin or Eswatini?
Benin, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Eswatini as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Benin and Eswatini?
0, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Eswatini?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Benin and Eswatini rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Benin ranks 106th and Eswatini ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.