Belize vs Nicaragua: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Belize
66.67
in 2014
Nicaragua
66.67
in 2014
Belize rank
44th
Nicaragua rank
44th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Belize
  • Nicaragua
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Belize currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 44th and Nicaragua ranks 44th of 181 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 64.44 2.22 Belize
2010s 66.67 66.67 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Belize or Nicaragua?
Belize, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Nicaragua as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Belize and Nicaragua?
0, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Nicaragua?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Belize and Nicaragua rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Belize ranks 44th and Nicaragua ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.