Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Belarus
33.33
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina
33.33
in 2014
Belarus rank
137th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
137th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 137th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 137th of 184 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 42.22 | 8.89 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Belarus, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Belarus ranks 137th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 137th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.