Bahrain vs Montenegro: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Bahrain
55.56
in 2014
Montenegro
55.56
in 2014
Bahrain rank
76th
Montenegro rank
76th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Bahrain
  • Montenegro
0204060200620102014

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 55.56 against 55.56 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahrain ahead.

Bahrain ranks 76th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 181 countries.

Bahrain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 55.56 44.44 11.11 Bahrain
2010s 55.56 55.56 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Bahrain or Montenegro?
Bahrain, at 55.56 against 55.56 in Montenegro as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Bahrain and Montenegro?
0, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Montenegro?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahrain and Montenegro rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Bahrain ranks 76th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.