Azerbaijan vs Moldova: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Azerbaijan
22.22
in 2014
Moldova
22.22
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
157th
Moldova rank
157th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Moldova
05101520200520092014

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 22.22 against 22.22 in Moldova, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 157th and Moldova ranks 157th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 22.22 22.22 0
2010s 22.22 22.22 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Azerbaijan or Moldova?
Azerbaijan, at 22.22 against 22.22 in Moldova as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Azerbaijan and Moldova?
0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Moldova?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Azerbaijan and Moldova rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Azerbaijan ranks 157th and Moldova ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.