Austria vs Hong Kong (China): Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Austria
88.89
in 2014
Hong Kong (China)
88.89
in 2014
Austria rank
3rd
Hong Kong (China) rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Austria
- Hong Kong (China)
How they compare
Austria currently reports 88.89 against 88.89 in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 3rd and Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Hong Kong (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.89 | 82.22 | 6.67 | Austria |
| 2010s | 88.89 | 88.89 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Austria or Hong Kong (China)?
- Austria, at 88.89 against 88.89 in Hong Kong (China) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Austria and Hong Kong (China)?
- 0, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Hong Kong (China)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Austria and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Austria ranks 3rd and Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.