Australia vs Micronesia (country): Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Australia
66.67
in 2014
Micronesia (country)
66.67
in 2014
Australia rank
44th
Micronesia (country) rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Australia
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 44th and Micronesia (country) ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Australia or Micronesia (country)?
- Australia, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Micronesia (country) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Australia and Micronesia (country)?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Micronesia (country)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Micronesia (country) rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Australia ranks 44th and Micronesia (country) ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.