Australia vs Jordan: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Australia
66.67
in 2014
Jordan
66.67
in 2014
Australia rank
44th
Jordan rank
44th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Australia
  • Jordan
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Australia currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Jordan, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 44th and Jordan ranks 44th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 66.67 0
2010s 66.67 66.67 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Australia or Jordan?
Australia, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Jordan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Australia and Jordan?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Jordan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Australia and Jordan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Australia ranks 44th and Jordan ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.