Armenia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Armenia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 44th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 44th of 183 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 66.67 | 13.33 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Armenia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Armenia, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Armenia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Armenia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Armenia ranks 44th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 44th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.