Armenia vs Poland: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Armenia
66.67
in 2014
Poland
66.67
in 2014
Armenia rank
44th
Poland rank
44th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Armenia
  • Poland
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Poland, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 44th and Poland ranks 44th of 181 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 53.33 66.67 13.33 Poland
2010s 66.67 66.67 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Armenia or Poland?
Armenia, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Poland as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Armenia and Poland?
0, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Armenia ranks 44th and Poland ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.